Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 12
Attacker wins (British/American): 3
Defender wins (German): 9
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1082 | 1067 | 52% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1210 | 1032 | 74% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1132 | 1010 | 67% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 930 | 996 | 41% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1086 | 1132 | 43% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 957 | 1166 | 23% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 1166 | 957 | 77% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1142 | 1133 | 51% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 963 | 930 | 55% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1081 | 1038 | 56% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1098 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1058 | 995 | 59% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1065.8 vs 1046.2 has a 52.82% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).